Measurement noise of a point autofocus surface topography instrumentTools Feng, Xiaobing, Quagliotti, Danilo, Maculotti, Giacomo, Syam, Wahyudin P., Tosello, Guido, Hansen, Hans N., Galetto, Maurizio and Leach, Richard (2017) Measurement noise of a point autofocus surface topography instrument. In: 16th Conference on Metrology and properties of Engineering Surfaces, 27-29 June 2017, Göteborg, Sweden. Full text not available from this repository.AbstractOptical instruments for areal topography measurement can be especially sensitive to noise when scanning is required. Such noise has different sources, including those internally generated and external sources from the environment [1].For some instruments, it is not always possible to evaluate each single contributor. Nevertheless, it is possible to evaluate the noise added to the output during the normal use of the instrument. Such noise is defined in ISO 25178 part 605 [1] as “measurement noise”. In this work, the measurement noise is assessed for a commercial point autofocus instrument (Mitaka MLP-3SP), installed in the manufacturing metrology laboratory at The University of Nottingham. The investigation is carried out by areal acquisitions of 100µm×100µmwith a100×magnification objective and a sampling distance of 0.1µm along the x-axis and 1µm along the y-axis. The measurement noise is evaluated by applying established subtraction and averaging methods described elsewhere [2,3]. The results reveal a maximum calculated value of 20nm (subtraction method) and a minimum of 8nm (subtraction method). An oscillationis observed in the acquired surface topographies, which is due to a thermal drift induced by the air conditioning system. The disturbance can be reduced using the temperature correction tool in the software of the instrument. Experiments performed when the air conditioning system is inactive, showed drift of the instrument due to the temperature which is estimated, in the worst case, as 0.9µm/oC(calculated as Sz/ΔT), over one hour measuring time. The investigation was then repeated applying the temperature correction tool and the evaluation of the measurement noise results in a value of 2nm (both methods).The overall temperature variation, measured in the housing chamber of the instrument, is smaller than 0.1o C during each repeated measurement. In conclusion, the point autofocus instrument shows a clear dependence on the environmental noise. The measurement noise uncertainty contributor in the worst case is estimated to be unoise=20nmwhen the temperature correction tool Abstract submitted to the www.metprops2017.se conference is not applied [2].The use of the built-in temperature correction tool allows the measurement noise uncertainty contributor to be reduced tounoise=2nm.
Actions (Archive Staff Only)
|
Tools
Tools
