A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data

Akanazu, Lilian Akudo (2025) A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data. MRes thesis, University of Nottingham.

[thumbnail of Lilian Akudo Akanazu_MRes Thesis.pdf]
Preview
PDF (Thesis - as examined) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Landslides pose significant threats to human life, infrastructure, and the environment. Rapid accurate assessment and identification of these landslides within days to weeks of their occurrence are crucial for timely disaster management and effective emergency response strategies. This study evaluated the performance of freely accessible EO-based tools - HazMapper and Google Earth Engine (GEE), alongside manual delineation technique in the detection and rapid mapping of landslides in Glengyle. Recent landslides which typically leave visible scars on the landscape were primarily considered using two approaches applied by these EO-based tools: pixel-based analysis and SLIP algorithm for change detection. The integration of these methods provides a comprehensive assessment of landslide areas as they consider both changes in vegetation cover and topography. By comparing the pre- and post-event composites of the study area, the landslides were detected based on the NDVI and landslide tracker binary raster image generated by HazMapper and GEE, while the manual technique employed the physical delineation of the landslides using satellite imagery. The performance metrics of these methods identified GEE as the best-performing method with an F1 score of 0.83 over HazMapper and manual technique’s 0.81 and 0.79 F1 scores respectively. The kappa value of 0.62 for GEE suggests that the tool’s efficacy in rapid landslide mapping performed substantially better than random chance. Replication of the GEE in the secondary (Rest and Be Thankful) and tertiary (Dortyol) study areas further assessed the tools efficacy in mapping other landslide types. With an F1 score of 0.82 and 0.93 for the secondary and tertiary locations, GEE correctly identified a substantial number of landslides in these locations better than random chance. The results suggest that GEE is a robust tool for rapid landslide mapping in emergency situations.

Item Type: Thesis (University of Nottingham only) (MRes)
Supervisors: Grebby, Stephen
Novellino, Alessandro
Keywords: Landslides, Earth Observation, Google Earth Engine, HazMapper, Normalised Differential Vegetation Index, SLIP
Subjects: Q Science > QE Geology
Faculties/Schools: UK Campuses > Faculty of Engineering
Item ID: 80395
Depositing User: Akanazu, Lilian Akudo
Date Deposited: 31 Jul 2025 04:40
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2025 04:40
URI: https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/80395

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View