The comparison between Bayesian belief network and traditional methodology of project risk management in large project: evidence from Chinese high-speed train manufacturer

LIU, JING (2010) The comparison between Bayesian belief network and traditional methodology of project risk management in large project: evidence from Chinese high-speed train manufacturer. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)

[img] PDF - Registered users only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB)

Abstract

This paper consider the comparison between traditional risk management methods (PRINCE2 and BS 6079-3: 2000) and Bayesian belief network according to evidence of China South Locomotive & Rolling Stock Corporation Limited (CSR) Sifang locomotive and rolling stock Co., LTD., meanwhile, consider the project conditions of it and carried on deep research in the risk management method. This paper investigated a sample of 37 responders who work about risk management to test the advantages and disadvantages of traditional risk management methods (PRINCE2 and BS 6079-3: 2000) and Bayesian belief network. The questionnaire method was used and the feedback collected with high quality. The findings and analysis of the research result will complement the primary research and benefit for the literature of project risk management.

Item Type: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Depositing User: EP, Services
Date Deposited: 20 Jan 2011 14:26
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2016 16:21
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/24049

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View