FU, JIAHUI
(2008)
Mr.
[Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)]
(Unpublished)
Abstract
China has become one of the most popular foreign direct investment
(FDI) destinations since 1980s, and its automotive industry always an
attractive playing field for the global automakers. As there was a gap
in the passenger car market in before the 1980s, all the domestic
manufacturers mainly at that time only produced trucks and buses for
transportation, tractors for agriculture, and jeeps for military. Thus,
the entry seems very necessary to supply this gap in the market; the
early entry will help them to win the first move advantage. For
European and U.S. automakers, the entry into China has become part
of their global strategy. They strive to build up a business base in the
Far East that will limit the dominance of Japanese firms.
From a global strategy point of view, the step of entry into China
seems very necessary; however, Chinas unstable institutional
environment and different kinds of regulation limit the speed of entry.
What the Chinese government wants to achieve through publishing
the regulations to foreign funds, is to foster its own automotive
industry and is not interested in turning China into an expansion base
for European, American and Japanese auto industries. Simply, the
government does not want to lose the control on this pillar industry
while it opens to the world. Till the mid-1990s, the auto industry was
still highly protected in China; high tariff and non-tariff trade barriers,
screening, foreign equity limits and local content requirements are
several common obstacles to the entry of foreigners.
In the past, many researchers have studied the policies in Chinas
automotive industry, but most of them mainly focus on two questions:
6
how does the protection environment in the auto industry affect the
utility of domestic consumer by limiting their access to the cheaper
import car?; and, how does the protected environment limit the
development of the industry? Most of articles argued that the policy
environment in China provides too much protection and is not good
for the growth of domestic manufacturers. However, there are few
studies focused on the foreign perspective; this paper would change
the angle from the domestic side to foreign side. This paper looks to
explore the link between policy regulations and entry model selection.
In order to analyse this link, two famous joint ventures in the China
automotive industry has been selected for study, the Shanghai
Volkswagen and Guangzhou Peugeot. In the case, three dimensions
about the entry strategy of these two companies will be analyzed.
Finally, this paper is going to answer the question of whether the
regulation is the main factor affect foreigners entry model selection
and whether the limited availability of the entry model would be the
important factor that affects the performance of joint ventures.
In this paper, there are four main sections: Literature review,
Methodology, Research analysis, and Conclusion. In the literature
review section (Chapter 2), all the related theories and models about
the entry model selection and entry strategies will be presented. The
methodology (Chapter 3) will explain the research method of this
research applied, the way to access the data, and the limitation of this
research as well. Research analysis is a large section. All economic
factors and regulations related to how foreign funds get in Chinas
automotive industry will be analyzed in Chapter 4. The case studies of
Shanghai Volkswagen and Guangzhou Peugeot will be shown in
Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 respectively; the three dimensions of entry
strategy of each joint venture: partner selection, control over alliance,
7
and conflict management will be fully analyzed here. Finally, this
paper is going to present some implications through the comparison
of Shanghai Volkswagen and Guangzhou Peugeot cases, and end with
a conclusion: Regulation and Policy, in some degree, limit the number
of available entry model choices to the foreigner, but any limitation on
the entry model selection should not fully be responsible to the
performance of the foreign funds in this industry. By implementing
and designing a right entry strategy based on the assumption of limit
entry model choice, the foreign funds can still perform very well.
Actions (Archive Staff Only)
 |
Edit View |
Tools
Tools
![[thumbnail of 08MALixjf3.pdf]](https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png "08MALixjf3.pdf")