Apples and pears? A comparison of two sources of national lung cancer audit data in EnglandTools Khakwani, Aamir, Jack, Ruth H., Vernon, Sally, Dickinson, Rosie, Wood, Nastasha, Harden, Susan, Beckett, Paul, Woolhouse, Ian and Hubbard, Richard B. (2017) Apples and pears? A comparison of two sources of national lung cancer audit data in England. ERJ Open Research, 3 (3). pp. 1-8. ISSN 2312-0541 Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/3/3/00003-2017
AbstractIn 2014, the method of data collection from NHS trusts in England for the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) was changed from a bespoke dataset called LUCADA (Lung Cancer Data). Under the new contract, data are submitted via the Cancer Outcome and Service Dataset (COSD) system and linked additional cancer registry datasets. In 2014, trusts were given opportunity to submit LUCADA data as well as registry data. 132 NHS trusts submitted LUCADA data, and all 151 trusts submitted COSD data. This transitional year therefore provided the opportunity to compare both datasets for data completeness and reliability.
Actions (Archive Staff Only)
|