Who’s afraid of the predicate theory of names?

Predelli, Stefano (2015) Who’s afraid of the predicate theory of names? Linguistics and Philosophy, 38 (4). pp. 363-376. ISSN 0165-0157

Full text not available from this repository.


This essay is devoted to an analysis of the semantic significance of a fashionable view of proper names, the Predicate Theory of names (PT), typically developed in the direction of the Metalinguistic Theory of names (MT). According to MT, ‘syntactic evidence supports the conclusion that a name such as ‘Kennedy’ is analyzable in terms of the predicate (general term) ‘individual named ‘Kennedy’’. This analysis is in turn alleged to support a descriptivist treatment of proper names in designative position, presumably in contrast with theories of names as ‘directly referring rigid designators’. The main aim of this essay is that of questioning the significance of PT and MT as theories of designation: even granting for the argument’s sake that names are analyzable as (metalinguistic) predicates, their designative occurrences may be interpreted in consonance with the dictates of Direct Reference—indeed, in consonance with the radically anti-descriptivist version of Direct Reference I call Millianism.

Item Type: Article
RIS ID: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/755746
Additional Information: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9177-9
Keywords: Names ; Descriptivism ; Millianism ; Direct Reference
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Arts > School of Humanities > Department of Philosophy
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9177-9
Depositing User: Predelli, Stefano
Date Deposited: 02 Jun 2016 12:33
Last Modified: 04 May 2020 17:11
URI: https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/33736

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View