Individual differences in good manners rather than compassion predict fair allocations of wealth in the dictator gameTools Zhao, Kun, Ferguson, Eamonn and Smillie, Luke D. (2016) Individual differences in good manners rather than compassion predict fair allocations of wealth in the dictator game. Journal of Personality . ISSN 1467-6494 Full text not available from this repository.AbstractObjective. One of the most common tools for studying prosociality is the dictator game, in which allocations to one’s partner are often described in terms of altruism. However, there is less consensus regarding the motivations driving these allocations, which may represent either emotional concern for others (compassion), adherence to social norms regarding fairness (politeness), or both.
Actions (Archive Staff Only)
|