Being more certain about random assignment in social policy evaluations

Stafford, B. (2002) Being more certain about random assignment in social policy evaluations. Social Policy and Society, 1 (4). pp. 275-284. ISSN 1474-7464

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
84Kb

Official URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=SPS&volumeId=1&issueId=04

Abstract

Social experiments have been widely utilised in evaluations of social programmes in the US to identify ‘what works’, whilst in the UK their use is more controversial. This paper explores the paradigmatic, technical and practical issues evaluators confront in using randomised experiments to evaluate social policies. Possible remedies to some of these problems are outlined. It is argued that although no evaluation methodology is problem-free, policy makers and researchers should be more confident about the merits of using random assignment, provided it is used in conjunction with other methodologies more suited to understanding why and how interventions work.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:random assignment,social policy, evaluations
Schools/Departments:Faculty of Social Sciences, Law and Education > School of Sociology and Social Policy
ID Code:732
Deposited By:Stafford, Prof Bruce
Deposited On:14 Jan 2008 16:56
Last Modified:14 Jan 2008 17:13

Repository Staff Only: item control page