Peer assessment of mathematical understanding using comparative judgement

Jones, Ian and Sirl, David (2017) Peer assessment of mathematical understanding using comparative judgement. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 22 (4). pp. 147-164. ISSN 1104-2176

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

It is relatively straightforward to assess procedural knowledge and difficult to assess conceptual understanding in mathematics. One reason is that conceptual understanding is better assessed using open-ended test questions that invite an unpredictable variety of responses that are difficult to mark. Recently a technique, called comparative judgement, has been developed that enables the reliable and valid scoring of open-ended tests. We applied this technique to the peer assessment of calculus on a first-year mathematics module. We explored the reliability and criterion validity of the outcomes using psychometric methods and a survey of participants. We report evidence that the assessment activity was reliable and valid, and discuss the strengths and limitations, as well as the practical implications, of our findings.

Item Type: Article
RIS ID: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/898007
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Science > School of Mathematical Sciences
Related URLs:
URLURL Type
http://ncm.gu.se/nomad-artiklarPublisher
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 17 May 2018 12:41
Last Modified: 04 May 2020 19:20
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/51858

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View