Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review

Spencer, Rachel and Spencer, Simon E.F. and Rodgers, Sarah and Campbell, Stephen and Avery, Anthony (2017) Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review. British Journal of General Practice . ISSN 1478-5242 (In Press)

[img] PDF - Repository staff only until 10 January 2019. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (382kB)


Background: There is a need for greater understanding of the epidemiology of primary care patient safety in order to generate solutions to prevent future harm.

Aim: To estimate the rate of failures in processing actions requested in hospital discharge summaries and to determine factors associated with these failures.

Design and setting: We undertook a retrospective records review. Our study population was emergency admissions for patients aged ≥75 years, drawn from ten practices in three areas of England.

Method: One GP researcher reviewed the records for 300 patients after hospital discharge to determine the rate of compliance with actions requested in the discharge summary and to estimate the rate of associated harm from non-compliance. Where GPs documented decision making contrary to what was requested, these instances did not constitute failures. Data were also collected on time taken to process discharge communications.

Results: There were failures in processing actions requested in 46% (112/246) of discharge summaries (CI 39-52%). Medications changes were not made in 17% (124/750) of requests (CI 14-19%). Tests were not completed for 25% of requests (CI 16-34%) and 27% of requested follow-ups were not arranged (CI 20-33%). The harm rate associated with these failures was 8%. Increased risk of failure to process test requests was significantly associated with the type of clinical IT system and male patients.

Conclusion: Failures occurred in the processing of requested actions in almost half of all discharge summaries, and with all types of action requested. Associated harms were uncommon and most were of moderate severity.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Dr Rachel Spencer was funded with a GP Career Progression award from the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research. The views expressed are the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR the NHS or the Department of Health.
Keywords: Patient safety; General practice; Care transition; Patient discharge
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Medicine > Division of Primary Care
Depositing User: McCambridge, Mrs April
Date Deposited: 10 Jan 2018 11:23
Last Modified: 10 Jan 2018 11:27

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View