Who does not participate in telehealth trials and why? A cross-sectional survey

Foster, Alexis and Horspool, Kimberley and Edwards, Louisa and Thomas, Clare and Salisbury, Chris and Montgomery, Alan A. and O'Cathain, Alicia (2015) Who does not participate in telehealth trials and why? A cross-sectional survey. Trials, 16 (258). pp. 1-10. ISSN 1745-6215

[img] PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (551kB)

Abstract

Background

Telehealth interventions use information and communication technology to provide clinical support. Some randomised controlled trials of telehealth report high patient decline rates. A large study was undertaken to determine which patients decline to participate in telehealth trials and their reasons for doing so.

Methods

Two linked randomised controlled trials were undertaken, one for patients with depression and one for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk (the Healthlines Study). The trials compared usual care with additional support delivered by the telephone and internet. Patients were recruited via their general practice and could return a form about why they were not participating.

Results

Of the patients invited, 82.9 % (20,021/24,152) did not accept the study invite, either by returning a decline form (n = 7134) or by not responding (n = 12,887). In both trials patients registered at deprived general practices were less likely to accept the study invite. Decline forms were received from 29.5 % (7134/24,152) of patients invited. There were four frequently reported types of reasons for declining. The most common was telehealth-related: 54.7 % (3889/,7115) of decliners said they did not have access or the skills to use the internet and/or computers. This was more prevalent amongst older patients and patients registered at deprived general practices. The second was health need-related: 40.1 % (n = 2852) of decliners reported that they did not need additional support for their health condition. The third was related to life circumstances: 27.2 % (n = 1932) of decliners reported being too busy. The fourth was research-related: 15.3 % (n = 1092) of decliners were not interested in the research.

Conclusions

A large proportion of patients declining participation in these telehealth trials did so because they were unable to engage with telehealth or did not perceive a need for it. This has implications for engagement with telehealth in routine practice, as well as for trials, with a need to offer technological support to increase patients’ engagement with telehealth. More generally, triallists should assess why people decline to participate in their studies.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Telehealth – Trials – Declines – Recruitment – Non-participation – Refusers
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Medicine > Units > Clinical Trials Unit
Identification Number: 10.1186/s13063-015-0773-3.
Depositing User: Daunt, Wendy
Date Deposited: 14 Aug 2017 10:47
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2017 23:21
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/44854

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View