The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models

Zhao, Fang and Veldkamp, Ted I.E. and Frieler, Katja and Schewe, Jacob and Ostberg, Sebastian and Willner, Sven and Schauberger, Bernhard and Gosling, Simon N. and Schmied, Hannes Müller and Portmann, Felix T. and Leng, Guoyong and Huang, Maoyi and Liu, Xingcai and Tang, Qiuhong and Hanasaki, Naota and Biemans, Hester and Gerten, Dieter and Satoh, Yusuke and Pokhrel, Yadu and Stacke, Tobias and Ciais, Philippe and Chang, Jinfeng and Ducharne, Agnes and Guimberteau, Matthieu and Wada, Yoshihide and Kim, Hyungjun and Yamazaki, Dai (2017) The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models. Environmental Research Letters, 12 (7). 075003/1-075003/14. ISSN 1748-9326

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Global hydrological models (GHMs) have been applied to assess global flood hazards, but their capacity to capture the timing and amplitude of peak river discharge—which is crucial in flood simulations—has traditionally not been the focus of examination. Here we evaluate to what degree the choice of river routing scheme affects simulations of peak discharge and may help to provide better agreement with observations. To this end we use runoff and discharge simulations of nine GHMs forced by observational climate data (1971–2010) within the ISIMIP2a project. The runoff simulations were used as input for the global river routing model CaMa-Flood. The simulated daily discharge was compared to the discharge generated by each GHM using its native river routing scheme. For each GHM both versions of simulated discharge were compared to monthly and daily discharge observations from 1701 GRDC stations as a benchmark. CaMa-Flood routing shows a general reduction of peak river discharge and a delay of about two to three weeks in its occurrence, likely induced by the buffering capacity of floodplain reservoirs. For a majority of river basins, discharge produced by CaMa-Flood resulted in a better agreement with observations. In particular, maximum daily discharge was adjusted, with a multi-model averaged reduction in bias over about 2/3 of the analysed basin area. The increase in agreement was obtained in both managed and near-natural basins. Overall, this study demonstrates the importance of routing scheme choice in peak discharge simulation, where CaMa-Flood routing accounts for floodplain storage and backwater effects that are not represented in most GHMs. Our study provides important hints that an explicit parameterisation of these processes may be essential in future impact studies.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: ISIMIP, Global hydrological models, Peak river discharge, River routing, Flood, Daily runoff, GRDC
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Geography
Identification Number: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7250
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2017 13:15
Last Modified: 30 Jun 2017 07:42
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/43882

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View