Environmental incentives for and usefulness of textual risk reporting: evidence from Germany

Elshandidy, Tamer and Shrives, Philip J. (2016) Environmental incentives for and usefulness of textual risk reporting: evidence from Germany. International Journal of Accounting, 51 (4). pp. 464-486. ISSN 0020-7063

[img] PDF - Repository staff only until 27 October 2018. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (1MB)

Abstract

Drawing on distinct German institutional characteristics related to cultural, legal, financial, and regulatory features, this paper investigates the extent to which environmental incentives influence German non-financial firms in revealing risk information in their annual report narratives. The paper also examines whether risk-related disclosure (aggregate risk reporting and the tone of news about risk) is useful by investigating its impact on market liquidity and investor-perceived risk. We find that the decision to provide or withhold such risk information is less likely to be significantly associated with environmental incentives. Among those incentives, we find that German firms are significantly influenced by their underlying risks rather than other factors including ownership structure, capital structure, external equity finance, and borrowing. The decision to disclose is likely to be influenced by the size of the firm and whether or not it produces lengthy annual reports. The results also suggest that the impact of aggregate risk reporting levels was not observable until a distinction was made between bad and good news about risk. Specifically, we find that the German market tends to positively (negatively) price good (bad) news about risk by either improving (worsening) market liquidity through removing (creating) information asymmetries, or reducing (increasing) investor-perceived risk.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Aggregate risk reporting; Good and bad news about risk (tone); Investor-perceived risk; Market liquidity; Textual analys
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Social Sciences > Nottingham University Business School
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.intacc.2016.10.001
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 23 May 2017 08:29
Last Modified: 23 May 2017 13:23
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/43019

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View