The Sparta and the Athens Of Our Age At Daggers Drawn: Polities, Perceptions, and Peace

Rendall, Matthew (2004) The Sparta and the Athens Of Our Age At Daggers Drawn: Polities, Perceptions, and Peace. International Politics, 41 (4). pp. 582-604.

[img]PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
227Kb

Abstract

While historically notions of democracy have varied widely, democratic peace theory has generally defined it in procedural terms. This article takes a close look at the Anglo-French confrontation of 1840. I show that while leaders on both sides were prepared to risk war to gain bargaining advantages, only the French left really wanted to fight. Why? By today's criteria, Britain was incontestably more democratic, with its monarch's powers far more restricted and its suffrage several times as large. Nevertheless, both sides considered France more democratic, with French republicans despising Britain as an aristocratic oligarchy. While Spencer Weart is right to argue that democratic republics may be hostile to oligarchic ones, they will not necessarily define each other according to modern procedural criteria. Instead, they may judge regimes by the broader social structures that shape power relationships and by outcomes, possibly explaining wars or near misses between democracies.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:In the published version of this article, I inadvertently omitted Sarah Ward from the acknowledgements. I am grateful for her research assistance.
Uncontrolled Keywords:Democratic peace, perceptions, oligarchy, Britain, France
Schools/Departments:Faculty of Social Sciences, Law and Education > School of Politics
ID Code:403
Deposited By:Rendall, Matthew
Deposited On:06 Nov 2006
Last Modified:09 Oct 2007 16:52

Repository Staff Only: item control page