Conceptual role semantics and the reference of moral concepts

Sinclair, Neil (2017) Conceptual role semantics and the reference of moral concepts. European Journal of Philosophy . ISSN 1468-0378

[img]
Preview
PDF (Conceptual Role Semantics and the Reference of Moral Concepts) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (241kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper examines the prospects for a conceptual or functional role theory of moral concepts. It is argued that such an account is well-placed to explain both the irreducibility and practicality of moral concepts. Several versions of conceptual role semantics for moral concepts are distinguished, depending on whether the concept-constitutive conceptual roles are wide or narrow normative or non-normative and purely doxastic or conative. It is argued that the most plausible version of conceptual role semantics for moral concepts involves only ‘narrow’ conceptual roles, where these include connections to motivational, desire-like, states. In the penultimate section it is argued, contrary to what Wedgwood, Enoch and others have claimed, that such an account of moral concepts cannot plausibly be combined with the claim that moral concepts refer to robust properties.

Item Type: Article
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Arts > School of Humanities > Department of Philosophy
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12191
Depositing User: Sinclair, Dr Neil
Date Deposited: 01 Feb 2017 12:39
Last Modified: 01 Feb 2017 12:44
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/40233

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View