Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking

Stupple, Edward J.N. and Maratos, Frances A. and Elander, James and Hunt, Thomas E. and Cheung, Kevin Y.F. and Aubeeluck, Aimee (2017) Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23 . pp. 91-100. ISSN 1878-0423

[img] PDF - Repository staff only until 25 November 2017. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (633kB)

Abstract

Critical thinking is an important focus in higher education and is essential for good academic achievement. We report the development of a tool to measure critical thinking for three purposes: (i) to evaluate student perceptions and attitudes about critical thinking, (ii) to identify students in need of support to develop their critical thinking, and (iii) to predict academic performance. Seventy-seven items were generated from focus groups, interviews and the critical thinking literature. Data were collected from 133 psychology students. Factor Analysis revealed three latent factors based on a reduced set of 27 items. These factors were characterised as: Confidence in Critical Thinking; Valuing Critical Thinking; and Misconceptions. Reliability analysis demonstrated that the sub-scales were reliable. Convergent validity with measures of grade point average and argumentation skill was shown, with significant correlations between subscales and validation measures. Most notably, in multiple regression analysis, the three sub-scales from the new questionnaire substantially increased the variance in grade point average accounted for by measures of reflective thinking and argumentation. To sum, the resultant scale offers a measure that is simple to administer, can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify students who need support in developing their critical thinking skills, and can also predict academic performance.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Critical thinking; Learning; Teaching; Cognitive reflection; Questionnaire; Argumentation; Dual process theory
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2016 15:32
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2016 23:31
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/39180

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View