Editorial "completeness" and the challenges of editing late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century prose fiction

Guy, Josephine and Scott, Rebekah and Conklin, Kathy and Carrol, Gareth (2016) Editorial "completeness" and the challenges of editing late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century prose fiction. English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920, 59 (4). pp. 435-455. ISSN 1559-2715

[img] PDF - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (262kB)

Abstract

Guy, Scott, Conklin, and Carrol join forces to analyze controversial questions about multi-volume variorum editions of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers such as Wilde, Conrad, Woolf, James, and Wyndam Lewis. What prompted such ambitious, costly editions that take years to complete? How do editors plan to compete with the many popular and scholarly editions readily available? Controversy has also emerged about the readership for these projects and how editorial principles have changed. At center is the thorny question of the role of an editor's value judgments and the "completeness" of an edition. On what grounds can a variorum edition claim to be "definitive"? Is there a better means of determining the "meaningfulness" of textual variants than a reliance on editorial judgment alone? Guy and company offer a timely consideration of variorum editions, the kinds of textual data such editorial scholarship provides and its relevance to literary critical judgments.

Item Type: Article
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Arts > School of English
Depositing User: Zimmerman, Emma
Date Deposited: 17 Aug 2016 07:42
Last Modified: 14 Sep 2016 18:16
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/35861

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View