Against strong pluralism

Noonan, Harold W. (2015) Against strong pluralism. Philosophia, 43 (4). pp. 1081-1087. ISSN 1574-9274

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (238kB) | Preview

Abstract

Strong pluralists hold that not even permanent material coincidence is enough for identity. Strong pluralism entails the possibility of purely material objects -- even if not coincident -- alike in all general respects, categorial and dispositional, relational and non-relational, past, present and future, at the microphysical level, but differing in some general modal, counterfactual or dispositional repscts at the macrophysical level. It is objectionable because it thus deprives us of the explanatory resources to explain why evident absurdities are absurd. A second objection is to the suggestion that cases involving artefacts can illustrate strong pluralism. This offends against the principle that gien a complex intrinsic microphysical property instantiated in some regiion, the number of material things possessing it in that region cannot depend on the existence and nature of intentional activity taking place outside it.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9640-4
Keywords: Pluralism, Coincidence, Goliath and Lumplde, re modality
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Arts > School of Humanities > Department of Philosophy
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9640-4
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2016 12:23
Last Modified: 16 Sep 2016 16:20
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/35853

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View