Parallels, prescience and the past: analogical reasoning and contemporary international politics

Mumford, Andrew (2015) Parallels, prescience and the past: analogical reasoning and contemporary international politics. International Politics, 52 (1). pp. 1-19. ISSN 1740-3898

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (173kB) | Preview

Abstract

Analogical reasoning has held a perpetual appeal to policymakers who have often drafted in historical metaphor as a mode of informing decision-making. However, this article contends that since the beginning of the ‘War on Terror’ we have arguably seen the rise of a more potent form of analogy, namely ones that are selected because they fulfil an ideological function. Analogical reasoning as a tool of rational decision-making has increasingly become replaced by analogical reasoning as a tool of trenchant ideologically-informed policy justification. This article addresses three key areas which map out the importance of analogical reasoning to an understanding of developments in contemporary international politics: the relationship between history and politics, in intellectual and policy terms; a critical assessment of the appeal that analogical reasoning holds for policymakers; and the development of a rationale for a more effective use of history in international public policymaking.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: analogical reasoning, war on terror, policy making, ideology, history, politics
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.40
Depositing User: Mumford, Andrew
Date Deposited: 15 Jul 2016 14:11
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2016 04:39
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/35053

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View