Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care

Slade, Mike (2017) Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World Psychiatry, 16 (2). pp. 146-153. ISSN 2051-5545

[img] PDF - Repository staff only until 12 May 2018. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (126kB)

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health care involves clinicians and patients working together to make decisions. The key elements of SDM have been identified, decision support tools have been developed, and SDM has been recommended in mental health at policy level. Yet implementation remains limited. Two justifications are typically advanced in support of SDM. The clinical justification is that SDM leads to improved outcome, yet the available empirical evidence base is inconclusive. The ethical justification is that SDM is a right, but clinicians need to balance the biomedical ethical principles of autonomy and justice with beneficence and non-maleficence. It is argued that SDM is “polyvalent”, a sociological concept which describes an idea commanding superficial but not deep agreement between disparate stakeholders. Implementing SDM in routine mental health services is as much a cultural as a technical problem. Three challenges are identified: creating widespread access to high-quality decision support tools; integrating SDM with other recovery-supporting interventions; and responding to cultural changes as patients develop the normal expectations of citizenship. Two approaches which may inform responses in the mental health system to these cultural changes – social marketing and the hospitality industry – are identified.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Slade, M. (2017), Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World Psychiatry, 16: 146–153, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wps.20412. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Keywords: Shared decision making; Mental health care; Ethics; Implementation; Routine outcome monitoring; Social marketing
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Identification Number: 10.1002/wps.20412
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 05 May 2016 13:54
Last Modified: 17 May 2017 23:21
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/33117

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View