A systematic review in select countries of the role of the pharmacist in consultations and sales of non-prescription medicines in community pharmacy

van Eikenhorst, Linda and Nde-Eshimuni, Salema and Anderson, Claire (2016) A systematic review in select countries of the role of the pharmacist in consultations and sales of non-prescription medicines in community pharmacy. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy . ISSN 1934-8150

[img] PDF - Repository staff only until 4 March 2017. - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (442kB)

Abstract

Background

Much has been studied in regard to non-prescription medicines (NPMs), but the impact of greater emphasis toward patient self-selection of such agents is still not well understood, and evidence in the literature might be equivocal.

Objective

The aim was to examine whether or not pharmacist interventions are important in the sale of NPMs and to summarize the evidence of pharmacists' contribution in maintaining patient safety and improving the quality of consultations involving NPMs.

Methods

Seven online databases were searched to identify the literature on studies conducted within the UK and in countries comparable to the UK reporting on consultations and selling of NPMs published between 1980 and 2013. All study designs except for quantitative surveys were eligible for inclusion into the review. The data extraction and quality assessment were performed according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. The data extracted from the studies were analyzed and presented qualitatively.

Results

Eighty-three studies from an original 12,879 citations were included in this review. Just under half of the studies were published between 2000 and 2009 (n = 38; 46%). Thirty-three (44%) of the studies were conducted in the UK. The review showed that in terms of the contribution of community pharmacy staff in consultations for NPMs, non-pharmacist staff dealt with a large proportion of the consultations and pharmacists were usually involved in the consultation through referral from non-pharmacist staff member. Counseling was not consistently offered to everyone. Where counseling was provided it was not always of sufficient quality. Consultations were performed much better when symptoms were presented compared to when people made a direct product request. Pharmacists were reported to conduct better consultations than non-pharmacist staff. There was evidence to suggest that where counseling was appropriately provided this afforded the person a safe environment to utilize their NPMs.

Conclusions

Seeking methods to develop better engagement with customers accessing pharmacy services for NPMs is necessary to enhance the interaction between these two parties. Efforts to enhance the community pharmacy environment to bring about a more positive experience for people using pharmacy is needed at present and will be important if the model for the selection of NPMs is modified in the UK. More studies are needed to allow a better understanding of the impact self-selection may have on patient safety in the community pharmacy context.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Non prescription medicines; Community pharmacy; Pharmacist; Pharmacy staff; Sale; Supply; Systematic review; Consultations; Patient safety
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Medicine > Division of Primary Care
University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Science > School of Pharmacy
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.02.010
Depositing User: Eprints, Support
Date Deposited: 22 Mar 2016 11:58
Last Modified: 26 Oct 2016 12:39
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/32464

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View