Happy IP: aligning intellectual property rights with well-being

Derclaye, Estelle and Taylor, Tim (2015) Happy IP: aligning intellectual property rights with well-being. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 1 . pp. 1-14. ISSN 1364-906X

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Available under Licence Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (429kB) | Preview


The Chicago School of the law and economics movement, on which the predominant justification for independent property rights is based in most countries, is flawed mainly because it takes economic wealth as the sole proxy for well-being. We suggest replacing it with a well-being approach, which, even if it is still based on utilitarianism, does not suffer from this defect. A theory-neutral approach to well-being for policy-making is achievable because there is a substantial area of common ground between rival theories on what we call the "markers" of well-being. We identify markers which we believe would be consistent with all mainstream theories of well-being and then verify whether the current intellectual property framework reflects the markers or not, and propose suggestions for change when it does not.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This material was first published by Sweet & Maxwell Limited in: Derclaye and Taylor, Happy IP: aligning intellectual property rights with well-being [2015] IPQ 1 and is reproduced by agreement with the Publishers.
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham, UK > Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: derclaye, prof e
Date Deposited: 02 Jul 2015 08:40
Last Modified: 14 Oct 2017 06:43
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/29124

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View