Scientific explanation and moral explanation

Leibowitz, Uri D. (2011) Scientific explanation and moral explanation. Noûs, 45 (3). pp. 472-503. ISSN 0029-4624

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
225Kb

Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00775.x/abstract

Abstract

Moral philosophers are, among other things, in the business of constructing moral theories. And moral theories are, among other things, supposed to explain moral phenomena. Consequently, one’s views about the nature of moral explanation will influence the kinds of moral theories one is willing to countenance. Many moral philosophers are (explicitly or implicitly) committed to a deductive model of explanation. As I see it, this commitment lies at the heart of the current debate between moral particularists and moral generalists. In this paper I argue that we have good reasons to give up this commitment. In fact, I show that an examination of the literature on scientific explanation reveals that we are used to, and comfortable with, non-deductive explanations in almost all areas of inquiry. As a result, I argue that we have reason to believe that moral explanations need not be grounded in exceptionless moral principles.

Item Type:Article
Schools/Departments:University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Arts > School of Humanities > Department of Philosophy
ID Code:1542
Deposited By:Leibowitz, Dr. Uri D.
Deposited On:28 Oct 2011 09:49
Last Modified:01 Sep 2013 01:00

Repository Staff Only: item control page