'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis

Nerlich, Brigitte (2010) 'Climategate': paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, 14 (9). pp. 419-442. ISSN 0963-2719 (print) 1752-7015 (online).

[img]PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
258Kb

Official URL: http://www.erica.demon.co.uk/EV/EV1919.html

Abstract

Climate scepticism in the sense of climate denialism or contrarianism is not a new phenomenon, but it has recently been very much in the media spotlight. When, in November 2009, emails by climate scientists were published on the internet without their authors’ consent, a debate began in which climate sceptic bloggers used an extended network of metaphors to contest (climate) science. This article follows the so-called ‘climategate’ debate on the web and shows how a paradoxical mixture of religious metaphors and demands for ‘better science’ allowed those disagreeing with the theory of anthropogenic climate change to undermine the authority of science and call for political inaction with regard to climate change.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Climate scepticism, climate science, policy, metaphor, framing, religion
Schools/Departments:Faculty of Social Sciences, Law and Education > School of Sociology and Social Policy
ID Code:1371
Deposited By:Nerlich, Professor Brigitte
Deposited On:14 Oct 2010 13:50
Last Modified:14 Oct 2010 13:59

Repository Staff Only: item control page