Don’t expect me to vote for you just because I like you, even if you do make me feel warm inside: a comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of party support

van der Eijk, Cees and Marsh, Michael (2007) Don’t expect me to vote for you just because I like you, even if you do make me feel warm inside: a comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of party support. In: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 29 August – 1 September 2007, 29 August - 1 September, Chicago. (Unpublished)

[img] PDF (Cees van der Eijk & Michael Marsh - Don’t expect me to vote for you just because I like you, even if you do make me feel warm inside — A comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of party support. Paper presented at APSA 2007) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB)

Abstract

The inclusion of non-ipsative measures of party preference (in essence ratings for each of the parties of a political system) has become established practice in mass surveys

conducted for election studies. They exist in different forms, known as thermometer ratings or feeling scores, likes and dislikes scores, or support propensities. Usually only one of these is included in a single survey, which makes it difficult to assess the relative merits of each. The questionnaire of the Irish National Election Study 2002 (INES2002) contained three different batteries of non-ipsative party preferences. This paper investigates some of the properties of these different indicators. We focus in particular on two phenomena. First, the relationship between non-ipsative preferences and the choices

actually made on the ballot. In Ireland this relationship is more revealing than in most other countries owing to the electoral system (STV) which allows voters to cast multiple

ordered votes for candidates from different parties. Second, we investigate the latent structure of each of the batteries of party preferences and the relationships between them.

We conclude that the three instruments are not interchangeable, that they measure different orientations, and that one –the propensity to vote for a party– is by far preferable if the purpose of the study is the explanation of voters’ actual choice behaviour. This

finding has important ramifications for the design of election study questionnaires.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: validation; survey measurement; party preferences; non-ipsative preferences; thermometer ratings; like-dislike preference items; propensity to vote preference items; ptv;
Schools/Departments: University of Nottingham UK Campus > Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
Depositing User: van der Eijk, Prof Cees
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2010 09:59
Last Modified: 25 Mar 2010 09:59
URI: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/1251

Actions (Archive Staff Only)

Edit View Edit View